翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ In the Company of Others ・ In the Conservatory ・ In the Constellation of the Black Widow ・ In the Cool of the Day ・ In the Cool, Cool, Cool of the Evening ・ In the Country ・ In the Country Fell a Star ・ In the Country of Juliets ・ In the Country of Last Things ・ In the Country of Men ・ In the County of Kings ・ In the Court of the Crimson King ・ In the Court of the Crimson Queen ・ In the Court of the Dragon ・ In the Court of the Wrestling Let's ・ In the Courts of the Conqueror ・ In the Courts of the Crimson Kings ・ In the Courtyard ・ In the Crease ・ In the Crossfire ・ In the Crosswind ・ In the Custody of Strangers ・ In the Cut ・ In the Dark ・ In the Dark (Billy Squier song) ・ In the Dark (Bix Beiderbecke song) ・ In the Dark (Dev song) ・ In the Dark (Grateful Dead album) ・ In the Dark (Kuprin) ・ In the Dark (The Whigs album) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク In the Courts of the Conqueror ： ウィキペディア英語版 In the Courts of the Conqueror ''In the Courts of the Conqueror: The 10 Worst Indian Law Cases Ever Decided'' is a 2010 legal non-fiction book by Walter R. Echo-Hawk, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the Pawnee Nation, an adjunct professor of law at the University of Tulsa College of Law, and of counsel with Crowe & Dunlevy. == Synopsis == The book draws from both well-known decisions of federal courts as well as less well known cases in explaining the doctrines of federal Indian law. The case of ''Johnson v. McIntosh'' by the Supreme Court in 1823 is well known to most law students as declaring that Indian tribes had the right to occupy the land but only the United States held title to the land by right of discovery. It covers other major cases, including ''Cherokee Nation v. Georgia'' (1831) (the tribe lacked standing to contest Georgia's violation of treaty rights), ''Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock'' (1903) (the U.S. had the right to confiscate Indian lands unilaterally despite treaty provisions); and ''Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States'' (1955) (discovery and conquest doctrines applied even when the Alaskan natives had separate dealings with Russia). The book covers cases involving the adoption of Indian children against the will of the tribes, leading to the Indian Child Welfare Act; decisions allowing the desecration of Indian graveyards and the display of Indians remains, leading to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act; and cases on Indian religious practices, such as ''Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association'' (1988) and ''Employment Division v. Smith'' (1990). Echo-Hawk notes how federal Indian law was formed defining Indian rights and were then used, not as a shield to protect theses rights, but instead to strip them away and harm Indian people.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「In the Courts of the Conqueror」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.